song_science
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
song_science [2023/08/03 22:47] – jasonj | song_science [2023/08/05 14:43] (current) – [How asteroseismology works] jasonj | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
====== SONG Science ====== | ====== SONG Science ====== | ||
- | A detailed understanding of stars underpins much of astrophysics. Stars are the most fundamental astrophysical objects, they are the basic constituents of galaxies, and, to a large extent, the overall properties of the universe are controlled by their evolution. | + | A detailed understanding of stars underpins much of astrophysics. Stars are the most fundamental astrophysical objects, they are the basic constituents of galaxies, and, to a large extent, the overall properties of the universe are controlled by their evolution. |
+ | ===== Science goals with SONG ===== | ||
+ | A tremendous amount of physics has been learned about the Sun from helioseismology, | ||
+ | |||
+ | Correspondingly, | ||
+ | - perform asteroseismology to study stars at a level of detail similar to what can be obtained for the Sun with disk-integrated observations; | ||
+ | - search for and characterize planets in orbit around other stars. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Enabling nearly-continuous, | ||
+ | * extend tests of stellar evolution models to other stars | ||
+ | * precise characterization of exoplanet host stars | ||
+ | * understand the effects and evolution of internal stellar rotation | ||
+ | * study the structure and age of low-metallicity and low-mass stars | ||
+ | * understand the dependence of the excitation of solar-like oscillations on stellar parameters | ||
+ | * test asteroseismic scaling relations with eclipsing binaries. | ||
===== Background: seismology of stars and stellar astrophysics ===== | ===== Background: seismology of stars and stellar astrophysics ===== | ||
Line 13: | Line 27: | ||
However, ground-based spectroscopic measurements of solar-like oscillations still have a hugely important role to play. In this case, the oscillation signal is encoded in the radial-velocity fluctuations that can be measured from stellar spectra. These observations can be used to target specific stars of interest almost | However, ground-based spectroscopic measurements of solar-like oscillations still have a hugely important role to play. In this case, the oscillation signal is encoded in the radial-velocity fluctuations that can be measured from stellar spectra. These observations can be used to target specific stars of interest almost | ||
+ | The analysis of radial-velocity modulations caused by solar-like oscillations requires ultra high-precision measurements, | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ===== How asteroseismology works ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | We focus on stars that pulsate like our Sun in what follows, both for simplicity and because the interpretation of the data is much more advanced than for other types of pulsators. Such solar-like oscillators need not be solar-type, main-sequence stars at all; for example, almost all red giants, such as the bright Aldebaran {[farr2018]}, | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{ : | ||
+ | |||
+ | The oscillations are global modes in a star, which distort the stellar surface with a spatial pattern that can usually be described by spherical harmonics, resulting in luminosity and radial-velocity variations. The figure shows 4 examples, where the red and blue denote the (highly exaggerated) distortion of the particular part of the surface, and white are nodes (no distortion). Cancellation effects due to the point-source nature of distant stars only allow for observations of the lowest spherical harmonic degrees (L=0 - 3). In the figure, the top 2 animations are for L=1 and L=3, which would be observable. The other two (L=6 and L=10, would not be). Power spectra of a time series of a solar-like oscillator show a comb-like structure of peaks within a broad acoustic mode envelope that has a maximum amplitude at some temporal frequency. This can range from about 20 μHz (half a day period) for evolved giants to a few thousand μHz (periods of minutes) for dwarfs. | ||
+ | |||
+ | These observed modal properties are often interpreted in terms of the asymptotic theory of stellar oscillations {[tassoul1980]}. In this case, the large frequency spacing is related to the sound crossing time of an acoustic wave across the star, and therefore scales with the mean density. An empirically-motivated relationship connects the frequenc of maximum power with the surface gravity and effective temperature {[brown1991]}. When these two relations are combined, scaling relations for a star's mass and radius can be derived {[kjeldsen1995]} | ||
+ | |||
+ | Other types of modes provide even more powerful diagnostics of interior conditions. In subsurface convectively-stable regions of stars, such as the cores of red giants, low-frequency gravity modes are excited. While they are not visible at the surface, they can interact and `mix' with acoustic modes and impart new information in the power spectrum. New frequency spacings appear, which can be used as diganostics of the core region, capable of providing the evolutionary state or inferring the core rotation rate. | ||
+ | |||
+ | All of the above may be considered as a broad application of asteroseismic analysis of global observables. SONG will go much further than applying the scaling relations. It will provide very precise individual mode frequencies for more modes than space photometry can, including mixed modes, L=3 modes, and modes split into multiplets by internal rotation. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Why do we need a global network? | ||
+ | Asteroseismology is a time-domain science and data analysis is carried out in the temporal frequency (Fourier) domain. Analysis is most successful when the power spectrum of the time series shows oscillation modes at distinct frequencies that can be identified (guided by models or empirical relations) according to their radial order and spherical harmonic degree. This requires sufficient duration to resolve the modes in frequency space, as well as ample sampling to capture the highest frequencies: | ||
+ | |||
+ | However, regular gaps in the data (such as from the day/night cycle) cannot be overcome by simply observing longer or more often, and lead to a sampling (window) function that is not optimal. The Fourier transform of this function is known as the spectral window. The power spectrum of the target star is thus effectively a convolution of this spectral window and the true underlying oscillation spectrum. For gapped data, the spectral window introduces alias frequencies into the power spectrum that do not correspond to real frequencies, | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | {{ : | ||
+ | |||
+ | The figure above demonstrates this issue by contrasting observations from idealized | ||
+ | |||
+ | The introduction of false frequencies that overlap and interfere with real ones can be absolutely detrimental | ||
===== SONG results so far ===== | ===== SONG results so far ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | The SONG-Tenerife node has been operating | ||
+ | |||
+ | The best observed SONG target is the G5 subgiant | ||
+ | |||
+ | μ Her is also orbited by three M dwarfs. Seismology with SONG data using the rotational frequency splittings has shown that μ Her's rotation axis is aligned with the system' | ||
+ | |||
+ | The baseline over which μ Her has been observed is approaching 8 years. And, like the Sun {[basu2016]}, | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | There are many other recent successes from the single SONG node that showcase its potential for transformative stellar astrophysics when the network is operational. Several examples are: a study of planet-hosting red giants to obtain accurate masses to understand the main-sequence progenitors, | ||
song_science.1691102857.txt.gz · Last modified: 2023/08/03 22:47 by jasonj