This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
uc:uc20250805_august_5_2025 [2025/08/26 21:06] nchanove |
uc:uc20250805_august_5_2025 [2025/08/26 21:48] (current) nchanove |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
* Seattle - nothing to report (by email) | * Seattle - nothing to report (by email) | ||
* Oklahoma - nothing to report | * Oklahoma - nothing to report | ||
- | * NMSU - There is still an interest in trying to understand/ | + | * NMSU - There is still an interest in trying to understand/ |
* NAPG - no report | * NAPG - no report | ||
* JHU - nothing to report (by email) | * JHU - nothing to report (by email) | ||
Line 66: | Line 66: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
- | === Additional site, telescope and instrument | + | === Additional site, telescope and instruments |
The summer shutdown is complete; it was fairly short this year. We accomplished daytime engineering in the first week and used the second week for on-sky engineering. All of the necessary baseline tasks in order to return the telescope to scientific operations were completed. This includes handwashing all the mirrors, a spring cleaning of the enclosure and instrumentation, | The summer shutdown is complete; it was fairly short this year. We accomplished daytime engineering in the first week and used the second week for on-sky engineering. All of the necessary baseline tasks in order to return the telescope to scientific operations were completed. This includes handwashing all the mirrors, a spring cleaning of the enclosure and instrumentation, | ||
Line 76: | Line 76: | ||
The 0.5m telescope is working as expected but the cameras (FlareCam and dcam-spare) continue to have problems. There was a loss of vacuum in the CCD canisters, which resulted in frosting/ | The 0.5m telescope is working as expected but the cameras (FlareCam and dcam-spare) continue to have problems. There was a loss of vacuum in the CCD canisters, which resulted in frosting/ | ||
- | APOLLO had numerous laser and optical alignment issues over the last month and a NASA team came back to the site to work on it. We believe the instrument is now back to working order but there may be additional work to be done to address a recent | + | APOLLO had numerous laser and optical alignment issues over the last month and a NASA team came back to the site to work on it. We believe the instrument is now functional |
As a reminder, we have a current opening (covered by two different job postings) for the 3.5m chief telescope engineer. We are currently reviewing applications for telescope operator/ | As a reminder, we have a current opening (covered by two different job postings) for the 3.5m chief telescope engineer. We are currently reviewing applications for telescope operator/ | ||
Line 90: | Line 90: | ||
=== 2025 Q4 3.5m scheduling === | === 2025 Q4 3.5m scheduling === | ||
- | All allocations for Q4 have been sent to the institutional schedulers; proposals are due on August 25. Note that in the allocation emails | + | All allocations for Q4 have been sent to the institutional schedulers; proposals are due on August 25. Note that the allocation emails |
---- | ---- | ||
Line 102: | Line 102: | ||
=== Status of new instrument initiatives === | === Status of new instrument initiatives === | ||
- | A replacement high speed imager, | + | * SoonerCam: we received a modest number of survey |
- | + | * KOSMOS grisms: we are still awaiting | |
- | + | * ASPEN: we are still awaiting a decision | |
- | '' | + | |
- | + | ||
- | We are purchasing | + | |
- | + | ||
- | '' | + | |
- | + | ||
- | '' | + | |
- | [[https:// | + | |
- | + | ||
- | '' | + | |
- | '' | + | |
- | '' | + | |
- | + | ||
- | **We really need users to complete this survey by the end of June. If anyone has specific requests or suggestions regarding desired capabilities for SoonerCam, that should be noted in the final question of the survey.** | + | |
- | + | ||
- | Work on the new optical echelle spectrograph continues with the goal of completing the Preliminary Design Review | + | |
- | + | ||
- | Regarding | + | |
---- | ---- | ||
- | === Future of ARCSAT Working Group === | + | === Open Positions at APO === |
- | This group is still meeting and exploring various options for the future of ARCSAT. | + | Please |
- | + | ||
- | ---- | + | |
- | + | ||
- | === Annual Request to Update Publication Record === | + | |
- | + | ||
- | Please | + | |
---- | ---- | ||
Line 141: | Line 118: | ||
Open action items from previous meetings: | Open action items from previous meetings: | ||
- | | + | * UC reps: ask your users to complete the survey regarding needs/ |
- | | + | * UC reps: ask your users to send Nancy the bibliographic information for any papers published in 2024-2025 that are resulting from 3.5m or ARCSAT data. STATUS: CLOSED |
+ | * UC reps: ask your users to complete the survey from FAWG (per Nancy’s email sent on 7/23/25). Status: OPEN. | ||
New action items from this meeting: | New action items from this meeting: | ||
- | * UC reps: ask your users to send Nancy the bibliographic information for any papers published in 2024-2025 that are resulting from 3.5m or ARCSAT data. | + | * None. |
---- | ---- | ||
Line 157: | Line 136: | ||
=== Next meeting === | === Next meeting === | ||
- | The next meeting will be on July 1, 2025 at 10:30 MDT. | + | The next meeting will be on September 2, 2025 at 10:30 MDT. |
---- | ---- | ||