apo-wiki

User Tools

Site Tools

Trace:
uc:uc20250506_may_6_2025

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
uc:uc20250506_may_6_2025 [2025/05/28 15:37]
nchanove 		uc:uc20250506_may_6_2025 [2025/05/28 15:46] (current)
nchanove
Line 95: Line 95:
 [[https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSeJG6zQg7YtGxGhAtaKULHyzZVZe29uHCiegcHdM0edglN1gw/viewform?usp=sharing]]'' [[https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSeJG6zQg7YtGxGhAtaKULHyzZVZe29uHCiegcHdM0edglN1gw/viewform?usp=sharing]]''
  
-''Thank you, +''Thank you,'' 
-On behalf of the SoonerCam team (including the Astro group at OU, Sarah Tuttle, Bill Ketzeback and the APO engineering/software team, and Nancy Chanover),+''On behalf of the SoonerCam team (including the Astro group at OU, Sarah Tuttle, Bill Ketzeback and the APO engineering/software team, and Nancy Chanover),'' 
 +''-Muk''
  
--Muk +Work on the new optical echelle spectrograph continues with the goal of completing the Preliminary Design Review this calendar year. Another grant proposal is in the works.
-'' +
- +
-Our preliminary proposal to the NSF for a replacement echelle was not invited for a full proposal. Work on the instrument continues with the goal of completing the Preliminary Design Review this calendar year, and additional sources of funds are being investigated.+
  
 We have no updates concerning Ocotillo. We have no updates concerning Ocotillo.
- 
-survey - when it comes around, what kind of memory it will consume (tons of data over long time?) - hope is to put in a focal reducer but right now the pixels are very small 
- 
  
 ---- ----
Line 115: Line 110:
  
 ---- ----
- 
  
 === ACTION ITEMS ===  === ACTION ITEMS === 
Line 123: Line 117:
   * UC reps: remind your users to review the Q2 schedule and request OPEN/DD time if they can make a good case for it. STATUS: CLOSED.   * UC reps: remind your users to review the Q2 schedule and request OPEN/DD time if they can make a good case for it. STATUS: CLOSED.
  
-New action items from this meeting: None+New action items from this meeting: 
 +  * UC reps: ask your users to complete the survey regarding needs/desires for a high speed imaging capability. The link to this survey was sent out to 35m-general on May 6, 2025 by Mukremin Kilic, and is also included above. STATUS: OPEN.
  
 ---- ----
Line 129: Line 124:
 === All Other Business === === All Other Business ===
  
-NC - data archiving +Nancy requested input from the UC reps concerning user needs/desires for data archiving. There was no clear consensus about what (if anything) APO should provide or facilitate in this area, but several UC members stated that it would be more useful to have reduced data available in an archive more so than raw data files. 
-Zach -  mixed reactions - yes it would be nice to see what has been observed, Worry about what would  make it most useful is to have reduced data products (out of reach). Another question : with new instruments to build it in? Russet - making data available and searchable/usable are 2 different things. Could be a strength/compromise - could be student opportunity. Sarah - lot of work.Misty - sounds nice but right now seems like a good time to discuss but not act. Zach - mini version could be way to archive data in Zenodo w/papers. Joanne - we should all upload all our best data to some repository. KS - reduced data in an archive is more useful. Keven +
  
 ---- ----
uc/uc20250506_may_6_2025.1748446651.txt.gz · Last modified: 2025/05/28 15:37 by nchanove

Page Tools

Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki