Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- uc:uc20250107_january_7_2025 [2025/01/24 19:59] – nchanove
+++ uc:uc20250107_january_7_2025 [2025/01/24 20:04] (current) – nchanove
@@ Line 69: / Line 69: @@
 === 2025 Q1 0.5 scheduling ===
-The 2025 Q1 ARCSAT scheduled is posted. We only had 2 requests this quarter (note added in proof: we received a third request, so there are now 3 programs scheduled to use ARCSAT in Q1. We are continuing to struggle with frequent failures in communication with the camera (which manifests as a "support library error"); FlareCam is getting old. The temporary fix is fairly quick so if observers can keep an eye on it and report errors it can be recovered pretty quickly. In early March we will have an onsite class and other stuff going on so ARCSAT is not available during weeks when the schedule is marked BUSY.
+The 2025 Q1 ARCSAT scheduled is posted. We only had 2 requests this quarter (note added in proof: we received a third request, so there are now 3 programs scheduled to use ARCSAT in Q1). We are continuing to struggle with frequent failures in communication with the camera (which manifests as a "support library error"); FlareCam is getting old. The temporary fix is fairly quick so if observers can keep an eye on it and report errors it can be recovered pretty quickly. In early March we will have an onsite class and other stuff going on so ARCSAT is not available during weeks when the schedule is marked BUSY.
 ----
@@ Line 88: / Line 88: @@
 === Status of new instrument initiatives ===
-We have heard no news from NSF regarding the pre-proposal that was submitted for ASPEN; we hope to hear soon. Sarah reported that since having received the Ocotillo CDR report on December 2 her team has been evaluating the comments and preparing a response. They also applied for some funding and are waiting to hear back. It is clear that the instrument will come together in a phased approach, bringing the three channels on line one at a time. They will start with the IFU and follow up with MOS component, which is more costly and mechanically complicated. The hope is that this would enable supported data reduction development along the way and troubleshooting as we go. It also spaces out the cost, which reduces impact on the overall observatory budget. Their goal is to have their response report back to the CDR review panel by the end of the month.
+We have heard no news from NSF regarding the pre-proposal that was submitted for ASPEN; we hope to hear soon. Sarah reported that since having received the Ocotillo CDR report on December 2 her team has been evaluating the comments and preparing a response. They also applied for some funding and are waiting to hear back. It is clear that the instrument will come together in a phased approach, bringing the three channels online one at a time. They will start with the IFU and follow up with MOS component, which is more costly and mechanically complicated. The hope is that this would enable supported data reduction development along the way and troubleshooting as we go. It also spaces out the cost, which reduces impact on the overall observatory budget. Their goal is to have their response report back to the CDR review panel by the end of the month.
 ----