This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
uc:uc20240806_august_6_2024 [2024/08/06 19:15] nchanove |
uc:uc20240806_august_6_2024 [2024/08/06 19:17] (current) nchanove |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 112: | Line 112: | ||
* Adam: would users be able to propose to use the instrument for their own programs or would it be used only for transient observations? | * Adam: would users be able to propose to use the instrument for their own programs or would it be used only for transient observations? | ||
* Adam: what is its primary advantage over KOSMOS given the wavelength coverage? Nancy: it has lower spectral resolution (which some but not all users would want) and the data are reduced and posted very rapidly (~ 15 minutes from data acquisition to posting online). | * Adam: what is its primary advantage over KOSMOS given the wavelength coverage? Nancy: it has lower spectral resolution (which some but not all users would want) and the data are reduced and posted very rapidly (~ 15 minutes from data acquisition to posting online). | ||
- | * Ben: when the Time Domain Astronomy Working Group (TDAWG) was active there was interest in a possibility of cross-institutional collaboration to use a portion of their time for this kind of work. | + | * Ben: when the Time Domain Astronomy Working Group (TDAWG) was active |
- | **Nancy will draft a synopsis of this discussion and send it to the Users Committee reps. The reps will then send it to their users and solicit their feedback in time for the next meeting.** Meanwhile Nancy will continue to discuss the technical aspects | + | **Nancy will draft a synopsis of this discussion and send it to the Users Committee reps. The reps will then send it to their users and solicit their feedback in time for the next meeting.** Meanwhile, Nancy will continue to discuss the technical aspects with the observatory staff to determine whether this is a viable option. |
---- | ---- |