This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision | |||
|
uc:uc20240305_march_5_2024 [2024/03/29 04:01] nchanove |
uc:uc20240305_march_5_2024 [2024/03/29 04:02] (current) nchanove |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 93: | Line 93: | ||
| * UC reps: ask your users what capabilities KOSMOS lacks that makes some people still want to use DIS. | * UC reps: ask your users what capabilities KOSMOS lacks that makes some people still want to use DIS. | ||
| - | * Colorado report: they did not have any users who would be upset if DIS were no longer available. One user said that the capability they really need is full spectral cover with a lower resolution prism. Another user said they needed higher resolution for planetary nebula projects. A third user said they could use bot or either of those options, but they really emphasized the need for good sensitivity in the blue. | + | * Colorado report: they did not have any users who would be upset if DIS were no longer available. One user said that the capability they really need is full spectral cover with a lower resolution prism. Another user said they needed higher resolution for planetary nebula projects. A third user said they could use both or either of those options, but they really emphasized the need for good sensitivity in the blue. |
| * UW report: their users require blue sensitivity, | * UW report: their users require blue sensitivity, | ||
| * NMSU report: their users need high resolution for line profile analysis, and could also make use of having a lower res mode that provided full spectral coverage in one go. | * NMSU report: their users need high resolution for line profile analysis, and could also make use of having a lower res mode that provided full spectral coverage in one go. | ||