This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
uc:uc20230307_march_7_2023 [2023/03/07 22:49] nchanove |
uc:uc20230307_march_7_2023 [2023/03/07 22:59] (current) nchanove |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 77: | Line 77: | ||
In response to last month' | In response to last month' | ||
- | Jon Holtzman presented an overview of pyvista, which he has been developing for several years. pyvista is intended to be a general purpose software package for reducing astronomical data (imaging and spectroscopy), | + | Jon Holtzman presented an overview of pyvista, which he has been developing for several years. pyvista is intended to be a general purpose software package for reducing astronomical data (imaging and spectroscopy), |
Other options for reducing spectrograph data include PypeIt (developed by X. Prochaska with a significant number of supporting helpers) and PyReduce. Eric B. reported that he tried to get PypeIt working with DIS data and had limited success; if someone wants to build on what he started it is possible, but it's a complex piece of software. Kevin reported that his group is using CERES to reduce ARCES data: https:// | Other options for reducing spectrograph data include PypeIt (developed by X. Prochaska with a significant number of supporting helpers) and PyReduce. Eric B. reported that he tried to get PypeIt working with DIS data and had limited success; if someone wants to build on what he started it is possible, but it's a complex piece of software. Kevin reported that his group is using CERES to reduce ARCES data: https:// | ||
Line 91: | Line 91: | ||
Plans for a multi-band imager are still being formulated, and require discussions with the UVa instrument team to flesh out how such an instrument would fit into their planned progression of instrument development efforts. | Plans for a multi-band imager are still being formulated, and require discussions with the UVa instrument team to flesh out how such an instrument would fit into their planned progression of instrument development efforts. | ||
- | Regarding a new echelle spectrograph, | + | Regarding a new echelle spectrograph, |
+ | ---- | ||
=== Q1 3.5m scheduling === | === Q1 3.5m scheduling === | ||
- | There is one unassigned | + | There is one unassigned |
---- | ---- | ||
Line 102: | Line 103: | ||
=== Q2 3.5m scheduling === | === Q2 3.5m scheduling === | ||
- | The Q2 schedule is in draft form and is nearly complete; we expect to be able to publish it before the end of this week. In Q2 we are expecting 3 visiting instrument runs (wit 2 different instruments) along with 4 on-site class groups. There were not too many programs that requested numerous partial nights (e.g. for a monitoring program) but we did receive requests from quite a few programs requiring observing time for specific events on specific dates that cross the midnight (A/B half) boundary, which means there ended up being lots of partial nights in the schedule. We are awaiting | + | The Q2 schedule is in draft form and is nearly complete; we expect to be able to publish it before the end of this week. In Q2 we are expecting 3 visiting instrument runs (with 2 different instruments) along with 4 on-site class groups. There were not too many programs that requested numerous partial nights (e.g. for a monitoring program) but we did receive requests from quite a few programs requiring observing time for specific events on specific dates that cross the midnight (A/B half) boundary, which means there ended up being lots of partial nights in the schedule. We are awaiting |
- | We only have one person signed up for the Q2 remote training opportunity that we offer for postdocs, research faculty, etc. so we may not offer a remote training in Q2. Despite our requests to receive notification about remote training needs well in advance of building the schedule (this information is conveyed every quarter in the allocation emails sent to the institutional schedulers), | + | We only have one person signed up for the Q2 remote training opportunity that we offer for postdocs, research faculty, etc. so we may not offer a remote training in Q2. Despite our requests to receive notification about remote training needs well in advance of building the schedule (this information is conveyed every quarter in the allocation emails sent to the institutional schedulers), |
---- | ---- | ||
Line 130: | Line 131: | ||
* UC reps: notify your users about the option of using pyvista (and/or some of the other packages listed above) for data reduction. | * UC reps: notify your users about the option of using pyvista (and/or some of the other packages listed above) for data reduction. | ||
- | * UC reps: notify your users that Nancy is seeking 1-2 echelle users to participate in the tiger team charged with firming up the science requirements for a new echelle spectrograph. | + | * UC reps: notify your users that Nancy is seeking 1-2 more echelle users to participate in the tiger team charged with firming up the science requirements for a new echelle spectrograph. |
* UC reps: poll your department users and if there is a need for a remote training in option for Q2, notify Russet ASAP (within the next day or so). | * UC reps: poll your department users and if there is a need for a remote training in option for Q2, notify Russet ASAP (within the next day or so). | ||
- | * UC reps: please | + | * UC reps: remind your users that they should notify us if their plans change and they wish to forfeit |
---- | ---- |